How I Minimize Distractions
Being clear on what’s important. Being honest with myself about my own habits. Protect how and where my attention is being pulled. Manage my own calendar.
I know I’m going to want to work on personal stuff, surf a bit, and do some reading. Knowing that I’m a morning person I start my day off before work on something for myself. Usually it falls under reading, writing, or coding.
After that I usually scan through my feed reader and read anything that catches my eye, surf a few regular sites and check my personal email.
When I do start work the first thing I do is about one hour of reactive work. All of those notifications and requests needing my attention get worked on. Right now this usually looks like catching up on email, Slack, Github, and Trello.
I then try to have a few chunks of time blocked off in my calendar throughout the week as “Focused Work”. This creates space to focus on what I need to work on while leaving time to be available for anyone else.
The key has been managing my own calendar to allow time for my attention to be directed on the things I want, the things I need, and the needs of others.
I do keep a running text file where I write out the important or urgent things that need to be done for the day. I’ll also add notes when something interrupts me. When I used to write this out on paper I used this sheet from Dave Seah called The Emergent Task Timer. I found it helped to write out what needs to be done each day and to track what things are pulling my attention away from more important things.
Because the type of work that I do can be interrupt driven I orientate my team in a similar fashion. By creating that same uninterrupted time for everyone it allows us to minimize the impact of distractions. During the week there are blocks of time where one person is the interruptible person while everyone else snoozes notifications in Slack, ignores email and gets some work done.
This also means focusing on minimizing the impact of alert / notification fatigue. Have a zero tolerance on things that page you repeatedly or adds unnecessary notifications to your day
The key really is just those four things I listed at the beginning.
You have to be clear in what is important both for yourself and for those you’re accountable to.
You have to be honest with yourself about your own habits. If you keep telling yourself you’re going to do something, but you never do… well there’s probably something else at play. Maybe you’re more in love with the idea rather than with the doing it.
You need to protect your attention from being pulled away for things that are not important or urgent.
You can work towards those three points by managing your own calendar. Besides tracking the passage of days a calendar schedules where your attention will be focused on. If you don’t manage it others will manage it for you.
I view these as ideals that I try to aim for. The circumstances I’m in might not allow me to always to so, but it does give me direction on how I work each day.
And yeah when I’m in the office I use headphones.
Chai 2000 - 2017
I lost my little buddy of 17 years this week.
Chai, I’m happy you had a peaceful morning in the patio at our new house doing what you loved. Sitting under bushes and in the sun. Even in your last day you still comforted us. You were relaxed throughout the morning, when I picked you up and held you as we drove to the vet till the end.
Chai, thank you for everything, we love you and you will be missed.
Why We Use Buzzwords
WebOps, SecOps, NetOps, DevOps, DevSecOps, ChatOps, NoOps, DataOps. They’re not just buzzwords. They’re a sign of a lack of resources.
I believe one reason why people keep coming up with newer versions of *Ops is there isn’t enough time or people to own the priorities that are being prepended to it. Forgot about the acronyms and the buzzwords and ask yourself why a new *Ops keep coming up.
It’s not always marketing hype. When people are struggling to find the resources to address one or multiple concerns they’ll latch onto anything that might help.
When systems administrators started building and supporting services that ran web sites we started calling it WebOps to differentiate that type of work from the more traditional SA role.
When DevOps came about, it was a reaction from SAs trying to build things at a speed that matched the needs of the companies that employed them. The success of using the label DevOps to frame that work encouraged others to orientate themselves around it as a way to achieve that same level of success.
Security is an early example and I can remember seeing talks and posts related to using DevOps as a framework to meet their needs.
Data related work seemed to be mostly absent. It seems instead we got a number of services, consultants, and companies that focused around providing a better database or some kind of big data product.
Reflecting back there are two surprises. The first being an early trend of including nontechnical departments in the DevOps framework. Adding your marketing department was one I saw a couple of different posts and talks on.
The second is even with the Software Defined Networking providing a programmatic path for traditional network engineering in the DevOps framework it really hasn’t been a standout. Most of the tools available are usually tied to big expensive gear and this seems to have kept network engineering outside of DevOps. The difference being if you are using a cloud platform that provides SDN then DevOps can cover the networking side.
ChatOps is the other interesting one, because it’s the one focused on the least technical thing. The difficulty people have communicating with other parts of their company and with easily finding information to basic questions that frequently come up.
This got me thinking of breaking the different types of engineering and/or development work needed into three common groups. And the few roles that have either been removed from some companies, outsourced, or they’re understaffed.
The three common groups include software engineer for front-end, back-end, mobile, and tooling. Systems engineering to provide the guidance and support for the entire product lifecycle; including traditional SA and operations roles, SRE, and tooling. The third is data engineering which covers traditional DBA roles, analytics, and big data.
Then you have QA, network engineering, and information security which seem to either have gone away unless you’re at a company that’s big enough to provide a dedicated team or has a specific requirement for them.
For QA it seems we’ve moved it from being a role into a responsibility everyone is accountable to.
Network engineering and security are two areas that I’m starting to wonder if they’ll be dispersed across the three common groups just as QA has been for the most part. Maybe SDN would move control of the network to software and system engineers? There is an obvious benefit to hold everyone accountable for security as we’ve done with QA.
This wouldn’t mean there’s no need for network and security professionals anymore, but that you would probably only find them in certain circumstances.
Which brings me back to my original point. Why the need for all of these buzzwords? With the one exception every single version of*Ops is focused on the non-product feature related work. We’re seeing reductions in the number of roles focused on that type of work while at the same time its importance has increased.
I think it’s important that we’re honest with ourselves and consider that maybe the way we do product management and project planning hasn’t caught up with the changes in the non-product areas of engineering. If it had do you think we would have see all of these new buzzwords?
It Was Never About Ops
For a while I’ve been thinking about Susan J. Fowler’s Ops Identitfy Crisis post. Bits I agreed with and some I did not.
My original reaction to the post was pretty pragmatic. I had concerns (and still do) about adding more responsibilities onto software engineers (SWE). It’s already fairly common to have them responsible for QA, database administration and security tasks but now ops issues are being considered as well.
I suspect there is an as of yet unmeasured negative impact to the productivity of teams that keep expanding the role of SWE. You end up deprioritizing the operations and systems related concerns, because new features and bug fixes will always win out when scheduling tasks.
Over time I’ve refined my reaction to this. The traditional operations role is the hole that you’ve been stuck in and engineering is how you get out of that hole. It’s not that you don’t need Ops teams or engineers anymore. It’s simply that you’re doing it wrong.
The Loss of a Sense Doesn’t Always Heighten the Others
Over a two week break my wife and I were talking about a statement she read where someone was called the “long time embedded photojournalist for Burning Man” and how she disagreed with this. This person wasn’t shooting for any news organization. They’re known to be one of the Burning Man faithful which removes some impartiality they may have. In essence they’re a PR photographer for Burning Man.
This made me consider most of the output from social media is in one of two different camps. The first is “Free PR” and the second is “Critics”. You’re either giving away free material to promote an idea, organization, product, or a person or you’re criticizing them.